The Mountain Laurel Review[_private/toc_for_second_level_pages.html]
bud_beck1.jpg (23412 bytes)  

The Publisher's Page

BY HAROLD T. BECK

AUGUST 29 - SEPTEMBER 4, 1998

SEPTEMBER 4, 1998

What was written and what was said

Often, they are not exactly the same. With the stock market crashing record numbers and Russia on the verge of political collapse and the President of the United States arriving in Moscow, I still manage a front page headline. "Beck again critical of CEM move" was reported by none other than Jim Buck of The Bradford Era.

Early on, the third paragraph in fact, Buck misstates facts, as usual. "Two weeks ago, Beck called for Zembryki's resignation, saying she had acted without approval from CEM's board of directors, which consists of the commissioners from the three counties for which CEM is named." The paper was dated September 1, 1998. The meeting on which he was reporting was August 31, 1998. The date of the letter was July 16, 1998. Two weeks maybe the way the news staff of The Era does math, but not by any other system. Maybe that is how Jimmy Olsen added up the numbers and came out with Jay Paul Kahle making more money than Stanley Pecora.

What Jim Weaver was paraphrased as saying at the meeting was also very different from the factual account of the discussion regarding a move to a facility that is not handicapped accessible.

What was said? From the official minutes of the meeting, here it is:

"Mr. Beck- Last Tuesday I did not attend the CEM meeting and it has been repeatedly pointed out that I have only attended 5 out of 16 meetings which is false. I have attended more than 5 meetings. I can't give the exact number but I can recall more than 5 meetings. There are several mis-statements there. First there was a solicitor's letter that was given. The solicitor mentioned it at the end of the letter, and I don't have the letter, that the board had approved the move and in fact the board did not approve the move. The board only voted to approve exploring the move. That does not give a director cart blanche to go out and spend money and sign agreements to move. Second, it is not clear who is going to pay for the chair lift to make this building handicap assessable. If it is going to be paid for by ARG, that is all well and good; but if it is going to be CEM, I would take serious exception to that. We already have over A$40,000 that I know of invested in this move. McKean County allocated over $175,000 a year to support CEM. I see the move as irresponsible, unnecessary, and costly. If you are going to have a supervisory board which the three Commissioners sit on in conjunction with six other Commissioners , why is it that the director is allowed to go ahead and make these type of decisions without the board voting on them? It appears from what I read in the paper and speaking with Mr. Weaver, that the board doesn't have to vote on it. The director can do what she darn well pleases. Finally the CEM meeting was originally scheduled for August 20 and I was going to attend, but then because some of the Elk and Cameron County commissioners couldn't make it and they felt they wouldn't have a quorum with just three of us so it was conveniently rescheduled for a day that I could not attend. I was never called for a comment and never asked what I thought about it, but again until CEM identifies to me who is going to pay the $50,000 or $60,000 for this chair lift, I cannot in good conscience vote to allocate another penny to CEM out of the county treasury and I would vote against even the standard allocation to them."

At that point Larry Stratton asked Jim Weaver if he had anything to say. This is where the discussion began.

"Mr. Weaver - I attended the CEM meeting and I expressed myself there and it was duly reported in the paper by my friend George."

"Mr. Stratton - I think the key word nobody really has defined was that at the original meeting in May the motion was made to allow her to proceed - did that mean have her proceed to finalize the contract or just proceed and report back to the board. The other counties feel that they do not want to be active involved in the day to day operation. They let the director make most of their decisions as that has been their past practice. We had an opinion from their solicitor that it was completely legal and was according to past practice of the organization. "

"Mr. Weaver - Their solicitor never talked to us."

"Mr. Stratton - No, he didn't talk to any of us."

"Mr. Weaver - It was my understanding when I left the previous meeting that it was for her to explore moving to the ARG building. I didn't hear any approval or vote."

"Mr. Beck - I would like to say that McKean County puts in $175,000 and that is more than Elk and Cameron counties combined. This is another one of those deals that we are in where we are putting in more money than any one else and we are able to be out voted six to three. Even if we do voice any kind of opinion then immediately the other tow counties will run into action and back up whatever they want to do. There are millions of dollars that is passed through CEM every year so our $175,000 to them is a drop in the bucket. However, $175,000 in the McKean County budget is a very significant item. We could put that money in family center, in CYS, or in many places where we have budget short falls and I really take exception to this shopping mall mentality where we just go out and spend money. This is bureaucracy at its worst. We are supposed to be over seeing what is going on here and now we find out we don't even have to vote on things, that the director can do whatever she wants according to the solicitor."

"Mr. Stratton - In defense of the situation over there, their program has grown terrifically in the length of time that they have been in that building. They have offices they are using now where their clients have to go through one office to get to another office and sometimes through two offices. Also they are in several location on two different floors which means they cannot have a common receptionist which is very ineffective."

"Mr. Weaver - Mr. Chairman, I never objected to the move. My main and primary concern is the Seneca Building  that they are in  now is handicapped accessible and the ARG building is not and I told Cindy Zembryki that I thought we are moving backwards and still make that statement. I asked her if she had a contract from ARG or some kind of letter indicating they are going to put an elevator in and she said they haven't got that far yet, but she told me they are moving the last of September to that building. I can't in all good conscience vote for that unless I see some kind of contract even if CEM is paying for it. We need to know whether they are going to have one or not."

"Mr. Beck - My point here is why have a governing board at all? Why don't we just let CEM run their own show and not have to attend meetings and we will just let her make all her own decisions. It appears that is what is going on anyway and we will send them their $175, 000 every year and we will forget about it. That is what it seems that they want us to do. $175,000 is an awful lot of money to the taxpayers of McKean County. I am not trying to take anything away from people that are mentally or physically handicapped. I am not trying to do that. I am one of the greatest supporters of this, but I do think that as  County Commissioners we have an obligation to have oversight over the bureaucracy and that is all CEM is - a bureaucracy and it is a bureaucracy that seems to grow unchecked every year."

"Mr. Stratton - this is an example of how things were in McKean County before we came in. People were not watching closely. We changed it. We told them we wanted much more oversight on them. If you gentlemen want to do that with this, we will do that in the future. All they asked for at that meeting was directions as to how we wanted them to proceed. Whether we wanted to be involved or whether we want them to proceed on their own . The other two counties did not want to become closely involved."

"Mr. Beck - Keep in mind, Larry, this is not the first time I have tangled with Cindy Zembryki. Go back to 1996 - they pointed out that they were getting a grant of $25,000 for us to investigate duplication of services in McKean county. I asked who was going to do this and it was pointed out that they had chosen the Bradford Family Center without asking us. We entered the picture and told them we would like to have some input here. When we called DPW and had the check coming to us, Cindy Zembryki interfered, stopped the check and told DPW that we were inexperienced and didn't know what we were doing. Here she is, a Potter County resident, saying that about us and telling us how we should spend money earmarked for McKean County. That $25,000 was the beginning of the McKean County Family Centers. If you want to check on attendance check on Cindy Zembryki's attendance at the Collaboration Board meetings. So this is not the first time this has happened where Cindy Zembryki goes off on her won and does what she darn well pleases without regard to the Commissioners of McKean County. I take serious exception to that and again I want to know who is going to pay for the chair lift."

"Mr. Stratton - I would expect if you would have made a phone call to her she would have clarified that for you."

"Mr. Beck - I think it should have been clarified up front and I shouldn't have to ask her."

"Jim Buck - Is ARG going to pay for it?"

"Mr. Stratton - That was my understanding of it but I did not particularly ask her."

"Mr. Beck - Larry, why is it incumbent upon me to call and ask for the specifics of a move that she wants? Shouldn't she have laid down the specifics of the move in writing and send it to the nine governing board members? Wouldn't it have been proper to do that? If they are exploring the move and going ahead and spending the money wouldn't it have been proper to put it down and say okay, we are going to need x number of dollars for each thing that they are doing? Why do we have to find things out after the fact after they have already spent the money? Why isn't it out in black and white who is going to pay for the chair lift? They are not cheap and it would cost at least $50,000 to put one in the courthouse."

"Mr. Stratton - I guess its the old story its hard to give answers if you don't know what the questions are."

"Mr. Beck - It's accountability! If you are going to spend public funds you have an obligation to put it down in writing and inform people about it. We are not talking about her money. We are talking about taxpayers' money here. We are talking about spending public funds. Are you going to defend somebody that spends public funds without informing anyone?"

"Mr. Stratton - No, I am not, but I guess the question was it is hard to give answers when you don't know the questions."

"Mr. Beck - There is nothing wrong with creating a budget. If you are going to move it is nice to know what it is going to cost up front rather than throwing bad money after good just to go ahead and complete the job once you are in it. Somebody somewhere   had to know what this was going to cost in total and that somebody should have put it down in writing and informed the nine members of the governing board if the governing board means anything and apparently the governing board doesn't mean anything and that is why nobody bothered to tell us."

Did Jim Buck tell us that? Of course he didn't! Instead he diverted attention away from the real issue. The real issue is this woman who is  a Potter County Resident, is spending money as if it is her money and fights off any oversight by elected officials and gets support because Cameron and Elk Counties are getting more for their dollar than McKean County is and she sees to it and they know it. The taxpayers of McKean County are the losers once more and I am the bad guy in Jim Buck's column because I speak out for our people, like I was elected to do.

Comments from Cindy Zembryki calling this setup "democracy" have little place in a story about an issue that affects the McKean County budget only. The same holds true about calling Joe Koch an Elk County Commissioner. We were talking about our funding of CEM and that was our business. Jim Buck missed the story. He slanted it to sound as if I was in favor of shutting off funds to places like Evergreen Elm, Futures Rehabilitation Center, and the Dickinson Mental Health Center. That is not true and that is a lie. I said in the meeting the following which is taken directly from the minutes:

"Mr. Beck - We are mandated to provide these services. Other counties do it in other ways. We have decided to combine with two other counties to provide the services. I want to know where the figure of $175,000 came from? I want to know why we are paying so much more than the other two counties? They have equal representation and they should pay as much as we pay. This again is one of these deals where we pay and are under represented. Maybe if they wouldn't keep hiring people to administer places like the Guidance Center and Beacon Light and give more money for treatment instead of administration we wouldn't have to pay so much. We have  a bureaucracy middleman making sure other people do treatment. This is government and that is how government works and it is frustrating."

What we need to get rid of is CEM and this Cindy Zembryki, who has a Masters Degree in Biology and no related degree in this field. We need a McKean County resident administering for McKean County people. It is time to put McKean County first and stop carrying Elk and Cameron Counties. That is what I was saying. It wasn't anything like what Jim Buck reported.

 

SEPTEMBER 3, 1998

Holly goes to Haiti

Some days are better than others. Holly will learn that if she hasn't already. Still, in a time when we all take things for granted. In a time when we only blink as the stock market crashes over 500 points. In these times when we are very comfortable, it does me good to know that the spirit of my generation is alive and well in a beautiful young woman who wants to help her fellow man. That woman is Holly Hassinger.

Remember John Kennedy saying: "Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country!" Remember the Peace Corps? Can you remember those days of change?

On September 7th Holly leaves the comfort of her home, her boyfriend, her mother, and her friends. On September 7th Holly joins the Peace Corps.

How many of us could give up the comforts we have grown so used to? Even when we go camping we are not exposed to the rugged and primitive conditions that Holly will have. Think about this.

She will leave the area and go to Miami where she will have one day to put her affairs in order and wrap up any administrative issues she may have. The next day she leaves the United States to begin a 27 month tour of duty in Haiti. It will not be like being in the military where everything is provided for you. She will not have government housing and prepared meals. Instead, Holly will literally join a community.

She will be taken in by a family in a rural mountain village. She will live in their home - a mud and concrete two room structure with a metal roof. There five or six of them will live together. They will cook their meals outside and will use a common village latrine. She will eat what they eat. It will be a diet of rice and beans with some corn, manioc, bananas, seasonal fruits, and vegetables such as mangoes, citrus fruits, wild greens, and tubers. If there is any meat, it will be chicken or goat. Perhaps from time to time there might be some fish. At the same time she will be learning a new culture and a new language, Kreyol. All the while, she will be gaining the trust of the village so that they will take her to them as their own and protect her.

Think of the danger that Holly is exposing herself. She is a pretty graduate of the State University of New York at Geneseo. Now she takes on the assignment of Marketing/Food Processing Advisor in a foreign nation where women are looked upon as property. She will encounter resentment as she does her work. There won't be anyone to protect her from sexual harassment and no one to sue when it happens. Through it all, she will have a job to do and a very important one at that.

Her duties will be to work with the local farmers, farmer groups, producer cooperatives, owners of small businesses, small merchant groups, and entrepreneurs to help strengthen and develop their business activities. Keep in mind that the average Haitian earns less than $400 annually. Her task is monumental. Holly will find that some days are undoubtedly better than others. She will be doing all of this while helping out in a series of local community projects in her village. She will have days that she would give anything for electricity, indoor plumbing, and a nice hot shower.

She will find that the knowledge she has accumulated in her short life will aid her in a nation where malnutrition and infectious diseases are widespread. Only 56% of the population has access to potable water. Holly will have to haul water for her own use several miles and she will be dealing with illiteracy, ignorance and superstition. She will need all of her abilities to deal with the problems that will immediately present themselves to her.

Like her mother, Sue Howard, The Director of the McKean County Family Centers, Holly will meet the challenge. We are confident that she will accomplish her goals and complete her tasks. In the end she will be a better person for what she has done. We wish you God Speed and the best of luck. God Bless and keep you safe until you return to us.

 

SEPTEMBER 2, 1998

Odds, ends,  District Attorneys, and the truth

Linda White of Warren sent on a copy of a Letter to the Editor of The Warren Times Observer. It is worthy of print here because it is universal and applies to other DA's.

"In the August 18 edition The Warren Times Observer your reporter solicited opinions regarding President Clinton. One of those asked was Frank Puskas, Assistant District Attorney of Warren County. He was quoted as saying Clinton has lied so many times he doesn't have a clear perception of what the truth is. He went on to say that the office of the District Attorney stresses that people must accept accountability for their actions but Clinton has kicked accountability to any doorstep but his own. Maybe Frankie should take a look at his boss if he wants to question accountability.

"Michael Brown lied something like seven hundred (700) times to Joey Massa but Joey went ahead with the Jay William Buckley Case (in the Kathy Wilson murder) anyway with this Michael Brown as the star witness. I guess Joey didn't, to quote Frankie, have a clear perception of what the truth was. Wouldn't you become suspicious, say, after the two hundredth lie or certainly after the four hundredth? Not our intrepid public servant. Joey went ahead and tried Buckley at the taxpayer's expense (like Ken Starr) and lost. Can anybody give me a dollar figure on that trial? (Nearly a million dollars to date, Linda. Don't forget the Superior and Supreme Court and the Private Criminal Complaint.) Remember now, the DA's office stresses that people accept accountability for their actions straight from Frankie.

"So in closing ask yourself if your star witness lied to you around seven hundred times, would you have a clue that maybe there's an iceberg in this Titanic's future? We certainly expect a DA (salary in excess of $50,000 annually) to know that. Who holds the DA accountable between elections? Maybe Frankie should but will he??"

Good letter, Linda. I need to point out to you that on February 4, 1990, Joseph Massa, Jr. wrote a letter to the Public Defender who was Brown's lawyer, and stated that his client was lying about Buckley and his own involvement in the Kathy Wilson Murder. I also want to point out to you that while Brown was on the witness stand   somewhere in the midst of lie number 400 to 500, the jury and defense attorney Barry Lee Smith saw State Police Investigator John Herzog shaking his head helping Brown keep his contrived story credible. Smith called Herzog to the stand and under oath Herzog admitted that he knew Brown was lying and also stated that the District Attorney knew Brown was lying.

What does the truth mean to Joseph Massa, or any District Attorney these days? It appears it means absolutely nothing! I draw your attention to my editorial of two days ago regarding a report that just may have been destroyed by a District Attorney and an Attorney General Special Prosecutor. This report, that is referred to twice by one of my political enemies is said to have never existed by the man who wrote it, also by the former District Attorney and the present District Attorney? The two of them testified under oath that it does not exist.

Linda, what if a copy of that report survived? Do you believe that former District Attorney Jeff Duke will be held accountable? Do you believe that current District Attorney Michele Alfieri will be held accountable? Do you believe that Special Prosecutor Jeff Leber will be held accountable? Do you believe in the tooth fairy?

Judge Wolfe, when faced with proof that Massa and Herzog orchestrated the entire case against Buckley, still refused to hold them accountable. Why?

Are lawyers immune to being prosecuted for their misdeeds? Should they be allowed to operate without regard to the law? Are there two sets of rules, one for them and one for us? It seems so, does it not?

As of this date, a plea bargain between the Attorney General of Pennsylvania and Michael Brown is in the works. Michael Brown will plead guilty to two counts of perjury. His punishment depends on Judge Millen. He could just give him time served and set him free once more. Do you think that is an outrage? The case cost Warren County over $700,000 to try. Who hold Massa accountable for that? Who holds the Attorney General accountable for shielding Massa from his involvement in the case? Who Linda? Who?

SEPTEMBER 1, 1998

THE RED NAPOLEON

In the midst of people staying up all night just to buy a video tape of Titanic, the world stands in peril. The President of the United States is in Moscow and Wall Street dropped 500 plus points on the Dow Jones Market. The Russian economy is in ruins and comparisons are being made to the beginning of the world depression that began in the late twenties. Fifteen Russian Rubles were being exchanged for one American Dollar.

Russia may be an economic dwarf; but it still is a nuclear superpower! The men in the Army who guard the nuclear weapons have not been paid in three months. When does the dealing of those weapons begin, if it already has not? Are we basking in the sunshine of a false sense of security? Are all of those people who are stock piling food and weapons and survival equipment in preparation for the Y2K cataclysm really on the right track?

My father was an old navy man. He served between wars when the navy was being downsized by international treaties. Battleships were being towed out to sea and sunk in an effort to eliminate the possibility of another World War. "For every battleship we sink," Will Rogers once said. "The Japs build three."

As a boy I was treated to stories about great naval engagements-like the Battle of the Jutland Sea-the largest single sea battle in history. It was said to have ended in a draw because the British did not pursue the escaping German Fleet. My father always disagreed with that estimation of the battle. He would insist that the British lost more ships, men and officers than the Germans. "The Germans didn't lose and the British didn't win. That still is not a draw. The British lost material and men and their loss did more damage than it did to the Germans." Many historians would argue with the policeman but that was his opinion and they would have had one hell of a time convincing him.

He had many books from that era. Many were large picture books showing the Dreadnoughts and the Super-dreadnoughts of the time. Each gave the tonnage that the monster boat would displace, the compliment of men, a report on its guns, and its estimated cruising range. Other books had actual pictures of ships in battle and some sinking with men dying in the water around them. Then there was another book. It was a red book that had no pictures. I never forgot it because I tried to read it several times but it was beyond the comprehension of a small boy.

It had four maps that were diagrams of military battlelines and one great sea battle. That was about all I could grasp. It was a World War that never took place. It was a World War that could have taken place and in many respects, did. I recently had my interest raised in that book and I was successful in my search for it on the internet. This past weekend I read it and in light of events in Russia, it is worth mentioning.

THE RED NAPOLEON by Floyd Gibbons was first printed by Grosset & Dunlap in June, 1929 and was "dedicated to the hope that it will not happen."

Floyd Gibbons was a war correspondent during World War One. He was also a Conservative who had a great fear of Communism and the dangerous situation in the world. In the light of North Korea, a nation that cannot feed its people, firing a missile that over flew Japan only yesterday, what more is there to say?

The book opens on the 17th of July 1941 with Gibbons at the old Bermuda Hotel in Bermuda and it is the fifth anniversary of the War between the United States and the World Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. He is representing the world press and exclusively reports on Karakhan, the Mongol dictator who conquered the entire world except for the United States, in exile and imprisonment.

It was in the Caribbean and at the Battle of the Windward Passage that we were able to turn the tide on this dictator who hated the white races and was bent on their extinction or there miscegenation with all other races. Karakhan believed in one race; the human race. His soldiers had but one order: Conquer and Breed!

This Red Napoleon was of course a Russian Communist. He rises out of the ranks and in ten years becomes a general in the army. He comes to power when Stalin is assassinated. He is seated in the car next to him when a Jewish dissident fires at them into the car in which they are riding. From that point on he takes control and Communism spreads over the world. China unites and  becomes Communist. Hostilities with Japan cease when the people over throw the monarchy and the military seizes control of the government. Russia invades Poland with a lightning style attack and then moves on her allies. The attack begins in January and by June all of Europe has fallen. England is taken without a shot fired when the Communists take control of the House of Commons and the Churchill Government is taken down. The powerful British fleet is in the hands of Karakhan.

When the dictator offers all remaining white nations the opportunity to join and is refused, the final stage of the war is begun. Australia is annihilated. Mexico is invaded from the Pacific and our naval forces are bottled up in the Gulf of Mexico. Finally we are invaded from the northeast and the northwest coming in along the Canadian boarder.   The United States holds out for two years. New York is in ruins and the battle continues for control of that strategic point. Finally, when the Battle of the Windward Passage is won and the control of the seas is wrested from the communists, the supply lines collapse for the five million man army fighting on our soil.

We all know that this never happened. However, in many respects, it did.

The lightning warfare described in this book is exactly the same warfare used by Hitler as he swept across Europe. Poland was invaded by Russia the same way it invaded in World War II.  American industrial might is kept at its peak using women in the factories, just as we did in the war. Battleships were attacked from the air and sunk when until that war, naval experts thought the idea as ridiculous. The fiction of 1929 became the reality of  1939 - 1945.

Even beyond that, The Department of War became the Department of Defense. That happens in the book in 1932 when Al Smith defeats Herbert Hoover. The Air Force becomes a separate branch of the military in 1933 and is under its own commanders and attacks in force leading the way for the navy and the army. Naval forces become battle groups centered around four battleships, four cruisers, two aircraft carriers, twenty-six destroyers, and packs of submarines leading the attack. The lesson of concentrating forces like we did in Pearl Harbor was not learned, yet Mr. Gibbons understood the impact as he described our attack on the Communist Fleet that outnumbered us 3 - 1.

With those glaring similarities and prophecies, is there anything else that we may be missing? Is Russian Communism really dead? Evidently not as we are now told that the Communist Party is the majority in the Duma, their version of the House of Representatives. Will they come back to power?

It was out of the economic crisis of 1918 that the Russian Revolution came about then. Are we on the verge of another?

Will their nationalism cause them to begin a conquest that will take back the territory of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics? Will they seek to dominate and control the now freed buffer zones of the neighboring Eastern European Countries that have since become members of NATO? What will we do if that happens?

Are we looking at a Red Napoleon within the next ten years just as Europe and the world did in Gibbons' 1929 novel? Is this the real Y2K disaster looking us in the face? 

AUGUST 31, 1998

The Pyle Report (Part One)

Has Charles Jeffrey Duke distinguished himself in the annals of deceit by sinking to the same level as William Jefferson Clinton? Does the Canon of Legal Ethics mean anything to him? What about morality and a sense of fair play? What about his feelings regarding Perjury and Obstruction of Justice? What about the Pyle Report?

At a hearing in October of 1997, former District Attorney Jeff Duke testified under oath that no report was ever compiled by County Detective Robert Pyle that itemized election code violations made by me during the 1995 campaign.

At the same hearing in October of 1997, current District Attorney Michele Alfieri testified under oath, concurring with Mr. Duke that no report was ever compiled by County Detective Robert Pyle that itemized election code violations.

However, the Attorney General, in his investigation, uncovered reports and evidence that a Pyle Report that itemized election code violations did, in fact, at one time exist.

Quoting from the Attorney General's investigation of allegations of election code violations we find the following:

"On October 21, 1996, Richard Kallenborn, 402 Chestnut Street, Port Allegheny, PA, telephone number: 814-642-2605, was telephonically interviewed by Agent Rice. Kallenborn related the following information: He is aware that former County Detective Robert Pyle conducted an investigation into Election Fraud Violations on the part of Bud Beck. At one point Pyle showed him a type written report containing approximately 14 points of election fraud violations Beck has committed.

"Kallenborn further stated that Marty Dahler, a McKean County Assistant Assessor was fired from his position shortly after Beck took office., due to the fact he had been asking questions about who the committee to elect Stratton and Beck were>

"The Election Board in McKean County consisted of Harry Lehman, George Burchmater (phonetic), and Illen McKean.

"Kallenborn further stated that he feels people that contributed to Beck's campaign were not listed on the proper contribution forms filed with the Board of Elections. Kallenborn stated that the people he feels gave to
Beck's campaign but were not listed are:

     1.  Jeff Franklin       2. The owner of Murphy's Bar        3. The             owner of the Carnegie Bar. 

"On October 23, 1996, Robert Pyle, DOB 8/29/48, 18 Edgewood Road, Bradford, PA, 16701 was telephonically interview by Agent Rice. Pyle provided the following information:

-He is currently an Assistant Chief with the Bradford City Police Department and was a former McKean County Detective.

-He did not investigate or write a report on Election Fraud activities pertaining to Harold "Bud" Beck. He is not aware of a typewritten report which contained 14 election law infractions committed by Beck.

-He is acquainted with Richard Kallenborn, a former McKean County Commissioner, but stated that he had never shown a written report to Kallenborn listing 14 Election Law violations on the part of Beck to Kallenborn.

-Pyle advised that one one point he traveled to WPIG Radio in Olean, N.Y. and obtained some documents for McKean County District Attorney Jeff Duke. He returned the documents to Duke and did not prepare a written report on the matter.

-Pyle stated that he would contact Richard Kallenborn in an  effort to determine what document Kallenborn was referring to.

On November 1, 1996, Richard Kallenborn, 402 Chestnut Street, Port Allegheny, PA, telephone number 814-642-2605 was telephonically contacted by Agent Rice. Kallenborn provided the following information:

-He has not had any contact with former McKean County Detective Bob Pyle since his last interview with Agent Rice of the Bureau of Criminal Investigation.

-Kallenborn still maintains that Pyle showed him a typewritten report containing 14 Election Law violations on the part of Bud Beck. Kallenborn stated that McKean County Commissioners Russell Johnson, telephone number: 814-887-5840 and Harri Jane Hanna, telephone number: 814-368-5133, were also present when Pyle showed the report to him."

The account of the investigation supplied by the  Attorney General   to my defense never indicated that Agent Rice did or did not contact County Commissioner Harrijane Hannon or Republican Party Chairman C. Russell Johnson. If Agent Rice was doing a complete investigation into this matter, would it not be a matter of course to follow up and determine if Pyle was lying or not? Would it  not have been a matter of course to determine the truthfulness of Richard Kallenborn? What if Agent Rice did do just that? What if Agent Rice did in fact determine that Kallenborn had told the truth and it was Pyle that was lying? Why then was that part of the investigation never made available to my defense? Why would this information and Pyle become protected and buried?

Logically, if we take what Pyle has said on the face as being truthful, there are still other questions that must be answered. Pyle stated the "only thing he did" was to go to radio station WPIG to get some information about ads I ran. Did he have a search warrant? Did WPIG violate my rights by giving him information without him having a search warrant? Was my privacy invaded? Does a District Attorney and his detective have the right to go on fishing expeditions without any just cause or any charges being filed? Think about it!  According to Pyle, that was all he did; yet Kallenborn said and then reconfirmed that it was factual that Pyle had a typewritten report on me. Who is lying? In the near future, we will find out. Get ready for Part Two.                                                                            

AUGUST 29 & 30, 1998

There are no new articles.


If you have a comment on this article please click here.

[ Top ]  [ Home ]