The Mountain Laurel Review[_private/toc_for_second_level_pages.html]
bud_beck1.jpg (23412 bytes)  

The Publisher's Page

BY HAROLD T. BECK

MAY 9 - 17, 1998

MAY 16-17, 1998

CENTRAL AMERICAN VISITORS

Warren and McKean Counties literally have over ten million visitors from Central America.  They are the Canaus Plexippus. In every day language, it is the Monarch Butterfly and they are here.

As spring comes to the floral jungles of Mexico and Central America and the daily temperature increases from 71 degrees to 102 degrees, the Monarchs gather and begin their migration. They swarm into groups of several thousand and start north. Their trip will cover over 1,800 miles. It will take nearly three months.

The Monarch butterfly  has a wing span of only four inches but it is able to travel as much as 50 miles a day. It will use currents of wind that seasonally change and accommodate the winged visitor.  These currents of air have existed for thousands of years. Perhaps they have existed from the earliest times of our history and the ancestors of this butterfly have traveled them like we would use US Route 6.

During the trip north the mature Monarch butterflies will stop along the way. They will deposit eggs and eventually die. However, the young will hatch, mature, and then somehow continue to the same area as the mature parent had been the summer of the previous year.

The Monarch has a bad taste to predators. Its coloration: reddish brown wings marked by black veins and a black border with two rows of spots, warns off hungry birds that instinctively know.

As summer comes to an end, even before we are aware of the coming change, the Monarch butterfly begins the journey south. Catching an ancient current of southerly air, it heads back to warmer climate and winter jungle flowers. There it will stay until spring when once more it will travel north.

Join with me and welcome these friendly Central American visitors. They are not here as illegal aliens. They are here as welcome guests. Take a moment or two and enjoy the beauty of this welcome guest.

MAY 15,  1998

WHAT'S BECOME OF OUR VALUES?

India detonates five nuclear devices and Pakistan prepares to answer with their own tests.  Ho hum!  Ellen Degenerate goes off the air. Oh my!

The tests in India really don't affect us.  India is a long way away and what do underground tests really mean anyway?  Our lives still go on. However, when admitted and proudly proclaimed Prime Time lesbian, Ellen Degenerate, does her last show (hopefully forever), there is some sense of disappointment.  Why?

The body of a two year old boy is found in the trunk of a car in nearby Chautauqua County following a week long search on the heels of the stabbing death of his mother. The Bradford Era determines that it is not close enough to us to be considered news. At the same time several days and many columns of ink are devoted to Seinfeld's last show. That is news because it was probably the most popular television program in northwestern Pennsylvania along with the entire nation.  Why?

Is it because we have become hardened to death and there is not enough comedy in the world?  Do little boys die at the hands of abusers so often that it has become just another item to bury on page three or ignore altogether?  What is becoming of us?

If I phoned my children and asked them about the news I would bet they would consider Seinfeld's last show as news.  If  I mentioned the fact that Frank Sinatra died of a heart attack last night, I seriously doubt that they would think much of it.  Old men die of heart attacks all the time. Seinfeld does his last show only once. After that there will be no Seinfeld.  Frank who?

While I never realized that Frank Sinatra ever played any part in my life, when I first heard the news at 4 A.M. this morning,  I was drawn to my collection of records and eight track tapes. I counted seven long play albums in Stereophonic Sound and six eight track tapes. Frank Sinatra at the Copa with him singing My Way was always one of my favorites.

I can recall hours that I sat and just listened to his music. I can remember the peace that it gave me as I escaped from a life that was too hectic and often more than I wanted to face. Is that why Seinfeld is so important to so many today?   Are we lacking peace in our lives? Perhaps we are.

As close as Edinboro we see the tragic and shocking events of children taking up fire arms and murdering people in cold blood. Around our nation we have children taking high powered rifles and ambushing their fellow classmates.  Why?  Are guns too readily available to these children? Some might say yes to that but I wonder if it is the fault of the guns and the gun owners? I wonder if the blame or the cause might not lay somewhere else?

Where was the peace in their lives?  Where was the comedy? Why did they have to kill? Why did they feel compelled to kill for no real or apparant reason?   Were they outraged or were they just looking for some kind of attention?  Were they angry and if they were, why?  Alot of questions weeks and months after the fact that the media will never ask and will only go on to the next killings or the next cancellation or whatever.

Our world has become too large for us to comprehend.  Too many people feel helpless, useless, or both. Too many people have no peace. That is why they turn to alcohol and drugs.  Too many children have no peace. That is why they also turn to alcohol and drugs and also feel compelled to take up weapons and kill so that they can be noticed.  That is why the death of  a two year old in nearby Chautauqua County is not news in McKean County.  That is a shame.

Values? We believe we have them and I am sure we do. We pay them lip service. We casually look the other way when elected officials circumvent the law.   We quietly accept bureaucrats making deals that affect each and every one of us. We ask: "What am I to do?" Then we go on with our lives. Days and weeks slip by and it has been more of the same old same old. 

This person dies, that series ends, and so and so is a lesbian. So what?   Life goes on and someone else takes their place. India detonates five nuclear devices and maybe McKean County is the designated place for a low level nuclear waste dump site.  What did you say?

MAY 14,  1998

ARE LIES OF OMISSION REALLY LIES? (or, government behind the scenes, business as usual.)

City of Bradford Mayor Connie Cavallaro was the subject of the Comment of the Day yesterday.  The comment was made by me about her when I said that...."I heard what you said on the radio and read what was reported in the newspaper.  Your nose is going to grow, Connie. You and I both know that you knew what Ray McMahon was doing."

I was kind in the way I said it, but Connie was lying.  Connie said that she had not participated in any secret meetings  in the same way that Kathy Kelly and Cheri O'Mara said they hadn't.  Put like that, it is the truth. Neither Connie, on behalf of the City of Bradford, nor the two Mall Shoppers, on behalf of the School District, had attended any meetings.  That is 100% accurate.

What is a lie is the fact that the City and the School District had not participated at all.  What is a lie is the fact that the Mayor and the Superintendent had no knowledge of what was taking place. If we are to believe that, or if it is in fact true, then the Mayor and the Superintendent should both resign because they have failed miserably in their responsibility to the taxpayers.  It is their job to know something of this magnitude.

Ray McMahon called the meeting.  The last time I checked he allegedly worked for the city.  Paul Timbrook represented the School District. John O'Connell represented American Refining Group; and solicitor Jay Paul Kahle and chief assessor Dave Evans represented the county. They in fact did meet.  ARG in fact did ask for a deal.

The fact they met was finally confirmed by The Bradford Era. The story Refinery seeking lower tax bill appeared in the Wednesday, May 13, 1998 edition. In the story Reporter Jim Buck confirms the Gates story and the fact that meetings had taken place.

John Gates' story, posted on this web site in mid-April and later published on April 29 in THE MOUNTAIN LAUREL REVIEW, was and is 100% accurate regardles of what Ray McMahon, Director of the Office of Economic and Community Development says. McMahon's public comments about the Gates article and its content are lies.  Not lies of omission; but lies.

Gates never said that he knew the deal as McMahon alleges. Of course Gates didn't know the name of the machine ARG wanted to buy. Gates did say and ask about how Witco operated all of these years without this vital piece of machinery.   He also asked why the taxpayers should subsidize ARG in the form of lower taxes so they can make the purchase. The fact that these meetings were taking place at all is significant.  It becomes so because this is the way these people conduct business.

They do busines in secret. McMahon sees himself as some kind of McKean County answer to the Trump Empire.  Afterall, like Trump, McMahon has a building named after him. We have Arvid Nelson to thank for that. We also anxiously await McMahon's own book, an extension of sorts, to the Trump book The Art of the Deal. What could the title be for this collection of experiences that have led to Bradford becoming what it is today? Perhaps Darkroom Deals or maybe even One For You, One For Me, None for the Taxpayers. (Just kidding, of course).

When people like McMahon are left unchecked and allowed to operate on their own as we and The Bradford Era have recently reported, then elected officials have an obligation to do something. They have that obligation unless they are part of these sneaky little deals that only hurt the little guy more than he is already hurting. (Not kidding here.)

There is no doubt in my mind that Kelly, O'Mara, and even Connie knew that this was going on and what it was all about. That was wrong and they should now come forward and admit it. It is time to cut out the lies and admit that a problem exists. In the light of day things are never as bad as they seem.  In the light of day maybe someone else just might have a solution that works. At that point there would be no need for lies of omission. 

MAY 13,  1998

IT ISN'T ENOUGH!

The Bradford Area School Board has failed in their responsibility to the taxpayers.  While school enrollment has remained constant, spending has increased at an alarming rate. Holding a public meeting and giving the okay to a tentative spending plan just doesn't sit well with many of us.

It doesn't sit well because there is no explanation as to why taxes must increase 10%.  They say that there is increased spending, but on what?  Why is it so necessary that we spend all of this extra money in the first place?

The standard threat is that they will be forced to cut programs if they don't get the increases that they need.  Making the threat to cut a program is usually all it takes. We will have alumni from around the world who attended Bradford High who will all make empassioned pleas and very sound arguments as to why the rifle team or the music program should not be cut.  As they make those arguments, I agree with every one of them.

There is no reason to cut programs.  What we need to cut is the administration of the programs.  How many school districts the size of the Bradford Area School District have a $45,000 a year Public Relations Director?  Why was this position necessary? Even if it was, why couldn't it have been filled by an entry level person who just graduated from school?  Starting salary for that position should have been in the area of $22,000.  Why such an extravagant pay scale?

Why pay Cheri O'Mara $80,000 and give her a car, too?   Superintendents with the proper credentials for the same size school districts are paid in the area of $60,000.  They are persons who have achieved some status in the education community and have distinguished themselves by completing the proper program and have been awarded their doctorate degree. Our superintendent has not done this.Judging the track record of runaway spending under her administration, it seems that the woman at the helm has a shopping mall mentality when it comes to fiscal restraint.

George Evans, at $45,000, appears to have better credentials than O'Mara. O'Mara taught kindergarten. Evans taught at St. Bonaventure University and was a professor of journalism and mass communications. He also worked for an architect in private industry and would have a better understanding of business in the real world. Certainly much more than our present Superintendent who can only spend and spend and spend.

When does it stop? When do taxes remain level?  When is enough, enough?   Before long, who can afford to live in the Bradford Area School District?

They deny a deal with ARG.  If they deny it and are forced to employ the services of their Public Relations Director to speak for them, then why were they so insistent that the county come to the meeting they called? 

At the current market value of 7.2 million dollars on the refinery, ARG receives a 32% tax decrease over what Witco paid in 1996. The School District collected $141,000 then, and would collect about $100,000 on the 7.2 million dollar assessment.  They wanted to allow ARG to pay less than that! Why?

For every dollar they reduce ARG by, it is that much more we have to pay. Something is wrong with this thinking.

They tell us they need more money.  They tell us they have to raise taxes 10%.  They don't explain why we need the new 1.2 million dollars.   They fail to tell us how much money they lost from the state because of excessive absenteeism.  Is that the $150,000 hole in the budget?  It seems to me that the two figures just might coincide.

I have been part of a management team that overcame an enormous deficit and now has balanced a similar budget.  We did it by living within our means and knowing where every single penny was coming from and where it would be spent.  The Superintendent, the fiscal director, and the School Board have the obligation to give the taxpayers the same results we have given them.

The taxpayers deserve to have their dollars spent in a much more conservative manner than what has been the past practice. It is time to put an end to the non stop increases in our taxes. We deserve an itemized accounting of where and how the additional 1.2 million dollars is going to be spent.  If it isn't on students, then don't spend it!

MAY  12,  1998

RIVER WALK FOR BRADFORD?

For those of us who have traveled like Jerry Clark of SIGN DESIGN, we are sorely aware that we are lacking in the area of River Walks.

San Antonio, Texas, has a River Walk and it is one of the great tourist attractions for the entire state.  Major hotel chains have constructed 400 room hotels along the River Walk and quaint little Mexican Restaurants offer their ethnic delights to tourists from all over the world.  Peddlers offer Mexican hats,   dresses, leather wares and brass wares in stores and on corners as well as various alcoves along the walk.  The people love it!

What's more, the City of San Antonio loves it too! A one percent sales tax has been levied for the purpose of maintaining the tourist attraction. The River Walk costs the taxpayers nothing and the city actually comes out ahead on the deal. Local school taxes are now non-existent because of the excess revenues derived from the walk.

Since 1976, the River Walk has produced a surplus in each and every year.  The cost of maintaining the continuous water flow, picking up papers, running the little river taxis that  carry tourists from restaurant to restaurant, bar to bar, and back to their hotels has by far been exceeded by the tax collected on all sales along the walk. The same could be true for Bradford!

Mr. Clark, a noted tourism advocate,  envisions the River Walk beginning at the new Pitt Campus Hyatt Regency Hotel (now currently being negotiated for with the able help of OECD Director Ray McMahon).  Mr. Clark has told The Mountain Laurel Review that LERTA status for 100 years will be necessary to attract this major piece in the River Walk puzzle. He has also told us  that Mr. McMahon has staked his reputation on his ability to deliver the 100 year - 100% tax free status to the Hyatt International Corporation. 

We are also told that Kathy Kelly and Cheri O'Mara are firmly behind this plan even though they have declined comment to the MLR and have denied that any such plan exists on WESB'S RADIO TALK SHOW, Live Line.  Bradford Mayor Cavallaro was unavailabe for comment, but we are confident that Mr. McMahon will inform not only her,  but the rest of the City Council as to their final decision after the fact, as has been his practice in the past. Thus the River Walk will go on.

The first lock must be built near Mutant Beach.  This is necessary in order to maintain water level in times of drought.  San Antonio, with a much smaller water supply has found this to be very viable and very manageable. This is key to the project. 

The local residents and major users of Mutant Beach have already begun the protests.  Complaining that Callahan Pool is too far of a  walk and citing the fact that public transportation is unreliable, not to mention their adamant opposition to the chlorinization of  the water in the pool, they have begun circulating petitions in opposition to the destruction of their historic site.

"Three generations of my family, all of us on welfare and residents of the Housing Authority, have used this beach," one resident who asked to remain nameless told us. "This is an outrage!" he insisted. "It is an absolute outrage."

A second lock will be constructed on the spot where the famous grocery cart rests just to the east of the Corner Bar and Restaurant. The water level will be raised to a height just below the outdoor deck. We are told that the parking lot of the Corner Bar and Restaurant will be eliminated by the Cummins Construction Company and be replaced by a white sandy beach.  While she was unavailable for comment, we understand that Dianne Cummins, owner of the popular downtown spot, has applied to the City for a permit to allow outdoor bathing on the new California style beach. 

Old City Hall now becomes the keystone of the entire plan!  We have learned that City Clerk Peggy Comilla and OECD Director Ray McMahon are negotiating with Hilton Hotels to renovate the historic building and open and exclusive Bed and Breakfast. A year round walking tunnel will be constructed in order to allow patrons easy access to the shops and other restaurants that will soon line the walk.  A roof top restaurant, Ray's Roost, is scheduled to open in early 2001 and will offer and an exclusive French cuisine, complete with male wait persons and imported Champagne.

A final lock will be constructed above the Mill Street Bridge.   There will be an overlook constructed complete with an informational kiosk so that visitors can observe, first hand, the cleanup operations that have begun and scheduled to be completed in the year 2347 at the ARG Refinery.

Penny Eddy, Director of the County Redevelopment Authority, has given her stamp of approval to this plan.  She has pledged County Community Development Block Grant Funds for the next forty-one years to the project.  When asked about the funding for the Super Cupboard Program, the MLR was told by an unnamed and uncooberated source that she said: "Let the little welfare rats starve! These funds are for concrete, not food."

Mr. Clark has told us that the new Bradford Area Alliance of Businesses and Businessmen is firmly behind this plan also.  "With that kind of brain power behind us, how can we fail? After all, these are the men and the leaders that have made Bradford what it is today."

He has also told us that the noted real estate attorney, Chris Hauser, is currently spearheading the plan to acquire the property along the famous waterway. "It is Hauser's expertise that is key to this plan ever coming this far. He has shown us how to set up deals. He does it so fast, no one hardly knows that the land has even changed hands. He has made it  so that we can overcome every hurdle. Chris is really important to the River Walk. One of the taxi stops will surely be named after him."

Thank you Jerry Clark. You are The Mountain Laurel Review man of the day, today, May 12, 1998. Good luck with the Bradford River Walk.

MAY 11,  1998

WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?

Judge John M. Cleland refused to allow Kathryn Jacobus to have her mother's body examined after death to determine whether or not she had indeed suffered from the diagnosed illness of altzheimers disease.  Keep in mind that it was also Judge Cleland who:               1.   Refused to allow Ms. Jacobus the right to visit her mother while   she was a patient at the Lutheran Home in Kane, PA.  That        decision  stemmed from a 1994 Mother's Day arrest of Ms. Jacobus when the Home refused her admission.                                              2.   Refused Ms. Jacobus' motion in court to allow her mother to continue to be fed.   Cleland's order to allow the Lutheran Home to deny Dorothy Jacobus all forms of nourishment led to her certain death from slow and painful starvation. Mrs. Jacobus only suffered for a little over four days following Cleland's order.

When Kitty Jacobus petitioned for an autopsy it was John Cleland who once more stood in the door. Having secured the services of the eminent pathologist, Cyril Wecht,  Ms. Jacobus wanted to finally know if the diagnosis of the Lutheran Home was indeed correct.  Cleland  blocked that for all time when he allowed the remains of  Dorothy Jacobus to be burried without an autopsy.

We fail to see what the problem was and even question Cleland's motives along with his alleged Judicial detatchment to the case. Cleland has had historic ties to the Lutheran Home in Kane. We wonder aloud if he was not concerned that the findings of such an autopsy might not have proved the long standing contention of   Kitty Jacobus that her mother was not a suffering altzheimer's patient?

Now, on May 11, 1998, the United States Government will exhume the remains of the UNKNOWN SOLDIER of the Vietnam War. They are doing so because several family members of one MIA have insisted that the remains are those of their brother. The United States Government is allowing this issue to be settled and give possible closure to the sisters of this man who has been missing for over 25 years.  The United States Government is allowing one of the most sacred sites in this nation to be opened and the remains of a fallen hero to be disturbed. Why? 

What is the difference between disturbing the remains of the UNKNOWN SOLDIER and allowing an autopsy of Dorothy Jacobus just to put a daughter's mind at rest? Is there a difference? We do not believe that there is.

We cannot expect John Cleland to understand the importance of the tomb of the UNKNOWN SOLDIER.  He actively protested and resisted  service during the Vietnam War.  That was his right to do so. After all, this still is America!   However, we would expect him to understand the concerns of a daughter who fought to keep her mother alive. 

Is it because HIS order allowed her to be starved to death that HE refused to allow  the autopsy to be performed?

Was he that much afraid of the possible truth that he wanted the facts to be burried once and for all?

We cannot answer those questions.  We can only ask them. After all, this still is America!                                              

 

MAY  10,  1988  

SCHOOL TAXES TO INCREASE  AT LEAST 10%

Most school districts have superintendents whose names begin with "Doctor."  Bradford Area School District has a superintendent we call "Cheri."  Our superintendent never completed a doctorial study. She was a kindergarten teacher.  It shows.

Recently, Cheri casually announced that school taxes would have to increase by 1.3 million dollars over last year.  That is more than what is allowed by law.  In the year immediately following a  reassessment school districts are allowed a maximum increase of only 10%.  1.3 million dollars is $150,000 over what is legally allowed.

This is not the first time that Cheri has been so casual with figures that directly affect what the taxpayers are forced to bear. This is not the first time that the figures have seemed to just change.  Remember when the plan was conceived to close schools and renovate and expand others?  We were told by Cheri and the School Board that it would cost us 23 million dollars.  We were told by Cheri and  the board, specifically her side kick the Prom Queen, that "they were borrowing the money to make money."  That was 1994.

Today is a different story.  The 23 million became 35 million.   Already insiders are aware that the renovations will cost us even more if they are to be completed as they should.  It seems that there might be a few errors and omissions in the original design.  On the bright side, the construction trades in the city are doing okay.  On the other side, the taxpayers have years of steady increases ahead of them.

While enrollment has remained steady,  the school district's budget continues to increase.  The new budget does not address any possible increase in teacher's pay with a new contract staring us right in the face.  Where will that money come from if we are forced to come up with new benefits and a 4% to 8% increase on top?

The new tax bill is a joke.  It must pass a referendum by the voters in the school district two seperate times.  Both legislative bodies in the State , The House and the Senate alike sold out the voters who gave them the HOMESTEAD ACT in good faith.  Our own Senator Slocum must take the blame as he knew that he was voting for a bad piece of legislation.  Still, he went along with what the Party wanted and did not have the courage to act on his principles. Why am I not surprised?

Give the voters the right to vote on the budget!  That is true tax reform.  Give the voters the right to tell Cheri and Kathy to stop spending our money like it is water.  Let us approve where and how our money will be spent.   If there ever was taxation without representation, the present way the Bradford Area School District is managed could easily be a model for it.

MAY  9,  1998

WE ARE NOW A DAILY ONLINE NEWSPAPER!

News stories will be posted daily. We will attempt to offer the news and slants on the news where the public has been misled.  For example:  Cheri O'Mara and Kathy Kelly, while appearing on WESB's live talk show, LIVE LINE,   were asked about the article in the MLR about a possible deal with American Refining Group.  Both denied that any deal was ever contemplated and both denied that   there was any truth to the article written by John Gates.  Both are liars.

Not only is John Gates' article 100% accurate, but we will soon publish more of the misleading statements made by O'Mara and Kelly on that live interview and in response to phone in questions.  Watch this place for more stories and commentaries as they happen.    

 


If you have a comment on this article please click here.

[ Top ]  [ Home ]